Is software quality possible ?
Question:
There's a caveat not to set a certain angle over 181 degrees.
Your boss changes the software so 360 degrees is allowed.
Then doctors a test program so the software appears to work.
If questioned he would probably mumble something about "updated the model to reflect the released code".
Isn't it obvious that he's one step ahead of us. We'll never be able to release a safe system.
But we've always known that there are not enough quality inspectors in the universe to ensure a correct, or safe, system, if those building the system don't want to build it correctly, or don't know how to.
Answer:
Even if those building the system use the best development techniques (clear requirements, clear architecture, reviews, defensive programming techniques, static analysis, white box tests, etc) and the qa group has a well thought out and reviewed test plan (feature/function, system, alpha, beta, acceptance, etc etc), and even if all of this is wrapped up in a well thought out product life cycle with milestones, reviews and measures there is still risk.
Software quality is always possible, as long as you decide what an acceptable quality level is.
Fault-less software is not, no matter who writes the software, who tests it, and how complete the life cycle.
what types software is it
I have worked on 4 CMMI companies, it is just for show, none of the actual projects have got any design document, zero comments in source code, no review of bug fixed, no updation of design document,so software quality is just another ******* word
More Questions & Answers...